VATcodexEU VAT case law · Court of Justice and General Court

Article 12 Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC

Rates

Title IX · Rates

Open in the compendium45 cases ↓

Repealed. The Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC was repealed with effect from 1 January 2007 and replaced by Directive 2006/112/EC. Most case law before that date cites it.

Text of Article 12

1.The rate applicable to taxable transactions shall be that in force at the time of the chargeable event. However:

(a)in the cases provided for in the second and third subparagraphs of Article 10 (2), the rate to be used shall be that in force when the tax becomes chargeable;

(b)in the cases provided for in the second and third subparagraphs of Article 10 (3), the rate applicable shall be that in force at the time when the tax becomes chargeable.

2.In the event of changes in the rates, Member States may:

—effect adjustments in the cases provided for in paragraph 1 (a) in order to take account of the rate applicable at the time when the goods or services were supplied,

—adopt all appropriate transitional measures.

3. (a)The standard rate of value added tax shall be fixed by each Member State as a percentage of the taxable amount and shall be the same for the supply of goods and for the supply of services. From 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010, the standard rate may not be less than 15 %.

The Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate to be applied after 31 December 2010.

Member States may also apply either one or two reduced rates. These rates shall be fixed as a percentage of the taxable amount, which may not be less than 5 %, and shall apply only to supplies of the categories of goods and services specified in Annex H.

The third subparagraph shall not apply to the services referred to in the last indent of Article 9(2)(e).

(b)Member States may apply a reduced rate to supplies of natural gas, electricity and district heating provided that no risk of distortion of competition exists. A Member State intending to apply such a rate must inform the Commission before doing so. The Commission shall give a decision on the existence of a risk of distortion of competition. If the Commission has not taken that decision within three months of the receipt of the information a risk of distortion of competition is deemed not to exist.

(c)Member States may provide that the reduced rate, or one of the reduced rates, which they apply in accordance with the third paragraph of (a) shall also apply to imports of works of art, collectors' items and antiques as referred to in Article 26a (A) (a), (b) and (c).

Where they avail themselves of this option, Member States may also apply the reduced rate to supplies of works of art, within the meaning of Article 26a (A) (a):

—effected by their creator or his successors in title,

—effected on an occasional basis by a taxable person other than a taxable dealer, where these works of art have been imported by the taxable person himself or where they have been supplied to him by their creator or his successors in title or where they have entitled him to full deduction of value-added tax.

4.Each reduced rate shall be so fixed that the amount of value added tax resulting from the application thereof shall be such as in the normal way to permit the deduction therefrom of the whole of the value added tax deductible under the provisions of Article 17.

On the basis of a report from the Commission, the Council shall, starting in 1994, review the scope of the reduced rates every two years. The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may decide to alter the list of goods and services in Annex H.

By 30 June 2007 at the latest the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and the Council an overall assessment report on the impact of reduced rates applying to locally supplied services, including restaurant services, notably in terms of job creation, economic growth and the proper functioning of the internal market, based on a study carried out by an independent economic think-tank.

5.Subject to paragraph 3 (c), the rate applicable on the importation of goods shall be that applied to the supply of like goods within the territory of the country.

6.The Portuguese Republic may apply to transactions carried out in the autonomous regions of the Azores and Madeira and to direct imports to those regions, reduced rates in comparison to those applying on the mainland

Consolidated version on EUR-Lex (CELEX 01977L0388-20060101). © European Union. Only the Official Journal is authentic.

Case law on Article 12: 45 cases

Judgments, orders and Advocate General opinions of the Court of Justice and the General Court that cite Article 12 of Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC, most recent first.

  1. C-565/24 P-GmbH & Co. KG (Coffee trips) Judgment · 10 September 2026 · Germany · cites Article 12(1)
  2. C-239/22 État belge and Promo 54 Judgment · 9 March 2023 · Belgium
  3. C-703/19 Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach Opinion · 12 November 2020 · Poland · cites Article 12(3), (3)(a)
  4. C-463/16 Stadion Amsterdam Judgment · 18 January 2018 · Netherlands · cites Article 12(3)(a), (3)(b)
  5. C-390/15 RPO Judgment · 7 March 2017 · Poland · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  6. C-16/14 Property Development Company Judgment · 23 April 2015 · Belgium · cites Article 12(1)
  7. C-219/13 K Opinion · 14 May 2014 · Finland · cites Article 12(3)(a), (3)(b)
  8. C-454/12 Pro Med Logistik and Pongratz Judgment · 27 February 2014 · Germany · cites Article 12(3), (3)(a)
  9. C-622/11 Pactor Vastgoed Judgment · 10 October 2013 · Netherlands · cites Article 12(1)
  10. C-366/12 Klinikum Dortmund Opinion · 26 September 2013 · Germany · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  11. C-360/11 Commission v Spain Opinion · 25 October 2012 · Spain · cites Article 12(4)
  12. C-497/09 Bog and Others Judgment · 10 March 2011 · Germany · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  13. C-41/09 Commission v Netherlands Judgment · 3 March 2011 · Netherlands
  14. C-49/09 Commission v Poland Judgment · 28 October 2010 · Poland · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  15. C-97/09 Schmelz Judgment · 26 October 2010 · Austria · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  16. C-156/09 Verigen Transplantation Service International Opinion · 29 July 2010 · Germany · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  17. C-492/08 Commission v France Judgment · 17 June 2010 · France · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  18. C-94/09 Commission v France Judgment · 6 May 2010 · France · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  19. C-3/09 Erotic Center Judgment · 18 March 2010 · Belgium · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  20. C-302/07 J D Wetherspoon Judgment · 5 March 2009 · United Kingdom · cites Article 12(3), (3)(a)
  21. C-309/06 Marks & Spencer Judgment · 10 April 2008 · United Kingdom · cites Article 12(1), (3)
  22. C-442/05 Zweckverband zur Trinkwasserversorgung und Abwasserbeseitigung Torgau-Westelbien Judgment · 3 April 2008 · Germany · cites Article 12(3)(a), (3)(b)
  23. C-132/06 Commission v Italy Opinion · 25 October 2007 · Italy · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  24. C-251/05 Talacre Beach Caravan Sales Judgment · 6 July 2006 · United Kingdom · cites Article 12(3), (3)(a)
  25. C-419/02 BUPA Hospitals and Goldsborough Developments Judgment · 21 February 2006 · United Kingdom · cites Article 12(3)
  26. C-305/03 Commission v United Kingdom Judgment · 9 February 2006 · United Kingdom · cites Article 12(3), (3)(a), (3)(c)
  27. C-291/03 MyTravel Opinion · 12 May 2005 · United Kingdom · cites Article 12(3), (4)
  28. C-475/03 Banca popolare di Cremona Opinion · 17 March 2005 · Italy · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  29. C-465/03 Kretztechnik Opinion · 24 February 2005 · Austria
  30. C-387/01 Weigel Judgment · 29 April 2004 · Austria
  31. C-381/01 Commission v Italy Opinion · 27 November 2003 · Germany, Finland, Italy, Sweden
  32. C-109/02 Commission v Germany Judgment · 23 October 2003 · Germany · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  33. C-384/01 Commission v France Judgment · 8 May 2003 · France · cites Article 12(3)(a), (3)(b)
  34. C-169/00 Commission v Finland Judgment · 7 March 2002 · Finland · cites Article 12(3), (3)(c)
  35. C-267/99 Adam Judgment · 11 October 2001 · Luxembourg · cites Article 12(3), (3)(a), (4)
  36. C-481/98 Commission v France Judgment · 3 May 2001 · France · cites Article 12(3), (3)(a)
  37. C-276/98 Commission v Portugal Judgment · 8 March 2001 · Portugal · cites Article 12(3), (3)(a)
  38. C-83/99 Commission v Spain Judgment · 18 January 2001 · Spain · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  39. C-36/99 Idéal Tourisme Judgment · 13 July 2000 · Belgium · cites Article 12(3)
  40. C-384/95 Landboden-Agrardienste Judgment · 18 December 1997 · Germany · cites Article 12(3), (3)(a)
  41. C-60/96 Commission v France Opinion · 20 March 1997 · France · cites Article 12(3)(a)
  42. C-45/95 Commission v Italy Opinion · 10 December 1996 · Italy
  43. C-343/89 Witzemann Judgment · 6 December 1990 · Germany
  44. C-324/82 Commission v Belgium Judgment · 10 April 1984 · Belgium
  45. C-222/81 Bausystem v Finanzamt München für Körperschaften Opinion · 6 May 1982 · Germany