VATcodexEU VAT case law · Court of Justice and General Court

Article 25 Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC

Common flat-rate scheme for farmers

Title XIV · Special schemes

Open in the compendium15 cases ↓

Repealed. The Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC was repealed with effect from 1 January 2007 and replaced by Directive 2006/112/EC. Most case law before that date cites it.

Text of Article 25

1.Where the application to farmers of the normal value added tax scheme, or the simplified scheme provided for in Article 24, would give rise to difficulties, Member States may apply to farmers a flat-rate scheme tending to offset the value added tax charged on purchases of goods and services made by the flat-rate farmers pursuant to this Article.

2.For the purposes of this Article the following definitions shall apply:

—‘farmer’: a taxable person who carries on his activity in one of the undertakings defined below,

—‘agricultural, forestry or fisheries undertakings’: an undertaking considered to be such by each Member State within the framework of the production activities listed in Annex A,

—‘flat-rate farmer’: a farmer subject to the flat-rate scheme provided for in paragraphs 3 et seq.,

—‘agricultural products’: goods produced by an agricultural, forestry or fisheries undertaking in each Member State as a result of the activities listed in Annex A,

—‘agricultural service’: any service as set out in Annex B supplied by a farmer using his labour force and/or by means of the equipment normally available on the agricultural, forestry or fisheries undertaking operated by him,

—‘value added tax charge on inputs’: the amount of the total value added tax attaching to the goods and services purchased by all agricultural, forestry and fisheries undertakings of each Member State subject to the flat-rate scheme where such tax would be deductible under Article 17 by a farmer subject to the normal value added tax scheme,

—‘flat-rate compensation percentages’: the percentages fixed by Member States in accordance with paragraph 3 and applied by them in the cases specified in paragraph 5 to enable flat-rate farmers to offset at a fixed rate the value added tax charge on inputs,

—‘flat-rate compensation’: the amount arrived at by applying the flat-rate compensation percentage provided for in paragraph 3 to the turnover of the flat-rate farmer in the cases referred to in paragraph 5.

3.Member States shall fix the flat-rate compensation percentages, where necessary, and shall notify the Commission before applying them. Such percentages shall be based on macro-economic statistics for flat-rate farmers alone for the preceding three years. They may not be used to obtain for flat-rate farmers refunds greater than the value added tax charges on inputs. Member States shall have the option of reducing such percentages to a nil rate. The percentage may be rounded up or down to the nearest half point.

Member States may fix varying flat-rate compensation percentages for forestry, for the different sub-divisions of agriculture and for fisheries.

4.Member States may release flat-rate farmers from the obligations imposed upon taxable persons by Article 22.

5.The flat-rate percentages provided for in paragraph 3 shall be applied to the price, exclusive of tax, of the agricultural products and agricultural services supplied by the flat-rate farmers to taxable persons other than a flat-rate farmer. This compensation shall exclude all other forms of deduction.

6.Member States may provide for the flat-rate compensation to be paid:

(a)either by the taxable person to whom the goods or services are supplied. In this case, the taxable person to whom the goods or services are supplied shall be authorized, following the procedure laid down by the Member States, to deduct from the value added tax for which he is liable, the amount of the flat-rate compensation he has paid to the flat-rate farmers;

(b)or by the public authorities.

7.Member States shall make all necessary provisions to check properly the payment of the flat-rate compensation to the flat-rate farmers.

8.As regards all supplies of agricultural products and agricultural services other than those covered by paragraph 5, the flat-rate compensation is deemed to be paid by the purchaser or customer.

9.Each Member State may exclude from the flat-rate scheme certain categories of farmers and farmers for whom the application of the normal value added tax scheme, or the simplified scheme provided for in Article 24 (1), would not give rise to administrative difficulties.

10.Every flat-rate farmer may opt, subject to the rules and conditions to be laid down by each Member State, for application of the normal value added tax scheme or, as the case may be, the simplified scheme provided for in Article 24 (1).

11.The Commission shall, before the end of the fifth year following the entry into force of this Directive, present to the Council new proposals concerning the application of the value added tax to transactions in respect of agricultural products and services.

12.When they take up the option provided for in this Article the Member States shall fix the uniform basis of assessment of the value added tax in order to apply the scheme of own resources using the common method of calculation in Annex C.

Consolidated version on EUR-Lex (CELEX 01977L0388-20060101). © European Union. Only the Official Journal is authentic.

Case law on Article 25: 15 cases

Judgments, orders and Advocate General opinions of the Court of Justice and the General Court that cite Article 25 of Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC, most recent first.

  1. C-262/16 Shields & Sons Partnership Judgment · 12 October 2017 · United Kingdom
  2. C-340/15 Nigl and Others Judgment · 12 October 2016 · Austria · cites Article 25(1), (9)
  3. C-160/11 Bawaria Motors Opinion · 24 May 2012 · Poland
  4. C-524/10 Commission v Portugal Judgment · 8 March 2012 · Portugal · cites Article 25(3), (12)
  5. C-180/10 Słaby and Others Judgment · 15 September 2011 · Poland · cites Article 25(1), (2)
  6. C-95/07 Ecotrade Judgment · 8 May 2008 · Italy · cites Article 25(1)
  7. C-333/05 Németh Opinion · 13 July 2006 · Hungary
  8. C-166/05 Heger Opinion · 7 March 2006 · Austria · cites Article 25(2)
  9. C-280/04 Jyske Finans Judgment · 8 December 2005 · Denmark
  10. C-43/04 Stadt Sundern Judgment · 26 May 2005 · Germany · cites Article 25(2)
  11. C-321/02 Harbs Judgment · 15 July 2004 · Germany · cites Article 25(1), (2), (3), (5), (8), (9)
  12. C-74/91 Commission v Germany Opinion · 15 September 1992 · Germany
  13. C-3/86 Commission v Italy Judgment · 28 June 1988 · Italy · cites Article 25(1), (2), (3), (5), (8), (12)
  14. C-415/85 Commission v Ireland Judgment · 21 June 1988 · Ireland · cites Article 25(1), (3)
  15. C-253/84 GAEC de la Ségaude v Council and Commission Opinion · 18 September 1986 · France · cites Article 25(3)