Article 176 Directive 2006/112/EC
Restrictions on the right of deduction
Title X · Deductions › Chapter 3 · Restrictions on the right of deduction
Open in the compendium45 cases ↓
Before 1 January 2007: Article 17 of Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC, according to the correlation table in Annex XII. The wording is not identical.
Text of Article 176
The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, shall determine the expenditure in respect of which VAT shall not be deductible. VAT shall in no circumstances be deductible in respect of expenditure which is not strictly business expenditure, such as that on luxuries, amusements or entertainment.
Pending the entry into force of the provisions referred to in the first paragraph, Member States may retain all the exclusions provided for under their national laws at 1 January 1979 or, in the case of the Member States which acceded to the Community after that date, on the date of their accession.
Consolidated version on EUR-Lex (CELEX 02006L0112-20250414). © European Union. Only the Official Journal is authentic.
Case law on Article 176: 45 cases
Judgments, orders and Advocate General opinions of the Court of Justice and the General Court that cite Article 176 of Directive 2006/112/EC, most recent first.
- C-515/24 Randstad España Judgment · 12 March 2026 · Spain · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-164/24 Cityland Judgment · 3 April 2025 · Bulgaria
- C-459/21 The Navigator Company and Navigator Pulp Figueira Order · 9 December 2022 · Portugal
- C-188/21 Megatherm-Csillaghegy Order · 3 June 2022 · Hungary
- C-334/20 Amper Metal Judgment · 25 November 2021 · Hungary
- C-837/19 Super Bock Bebidas Order · 17 September 2020 · Portugal
- C-630/19 PAGE International Order · 26 February 2020 · Portugal
- C-225/18 Grupa Lotos Judgment · 2 May 2019 · Poland · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-552/16 Wind Inovation 1 Judgment · 9 November 2017 · Bulgaria
- C-132/16 Iberdrola Inmobiliaria Real Estate Investments Judgment · 14 September 2017 · Bulgaria
- C-124/12 AES-3C Maritza East 1 Judgment · 18 July 2013 · Bulgaria
- C-160/11 Bawaria Motors Judgment · 19 July 2012 · Poland
- C-594/10 van Laarhoven Judgment · 16 February 2012 · Netherlands · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-118/11 Eon Aset Menidjmunt Judgment · 16 February 2012 · Bulgaria
- C-438/09 Dankowski Judgment · 22 December 2010 · Poland · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-540/09 Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken Opinion · 16 December 2010 · Sweden · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-395/09 Oasis East Judgment · 30 September 2010 · Poland · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-49/09 Commission v Poland Opinion · 10 June 2010 · Poland · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-538/08 X Holding and Oracle Nederland Judgment · 15 April 2010 · Netherlands · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-581/08 EMI Group Opinion · 15 April 2010 · United Kingdom · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-460/07 Puffer Judgment · 23 April 2009 · Austria · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-74/08 PARAT Automotive Cabrio Judgment · 23 April 2009 · Hungary · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-414/07 Magoora Judgment · 22 December 2008 · Poland · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-515/07 Vereniging Noordelijke Land- en Tuinbouw Organisatie Opinion · 22 December 2008 · Netherlands · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-371/07 Danfoss and AstraZeneca Judgment · 11 December 2008 · Denmark · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-95/07 Ecotrade Judgment · 8 May 2008 · Italy · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-368/06 Cedilac Opinion · 18 September 2007 · France · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-228/05 Stradasfalti Judgment · 14 September 2006 · Italy · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-184/04 Uudenkaupungin kaupunki Judgment · 30 March 2006 · Finland · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-280/04 Jyske Finans Judgment · 8 December 2005 · Denmark · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-434/03 Charles and Charles-Tijmens Judgment · 14 July 2005 · Netherlands · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-25/03 HE Judgment · 21 April 2005 · Germany · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-155/01 Cookies World Judgment · 11 September 2003 · Austria · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-17/01 Sudholz Opinion · 24 October 2002 · Germany · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-409/99 Metropol and Stadler Judgment · 8 January 2002 · Austria · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-345/99 Commission v France Judgment · 14 June 2001 · France · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-40/00 Commission v France Judgment · 14 June 2001 · France · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-338/98 Commission v Netherlands Opinion · 31 May 2001 · Netherlands · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-177/99 Ampafrance and Sanofi Judgment · 19 September 2000 · France · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-36/99 Idéal Tourisme Opinion · 11 May 2000 · Belgium · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-305/97 Royscot and Others Judgment · 5 October 1999 · United Kingdom · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-43/96 Commission v France Judgment · 18 June 1998 · France · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-45/95 Commission v Italy Judgment · 25 June 1997 · Italy · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-97/90 Lennartz Opinion · 30 April 1991 · Germany · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-165/86 Intiem v Staatssecretaris van Financiën Judgment · 8 March 1988 · Netherlands · cites Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive
VAT Committee guidelines on Article 176: 1
Not binding. Positions agreed in the VAT Committee set up under Article 398 of Directive 2006/112/EC and published by the Commission.
- Meeting 029 · 1990-12-17-18 · document I.2. Article 17(6)* – right of deduction – stand-still exclusion – leisure and recreational activities