Article 96 Directive 2006/112/EC
Standard rate
Title VIII · Rates › Chapter 2 · Structure and level of rates › Section 1 · Standard rate
Open in the compendium39 cases ↓
Text of Article 96
Member States shall apply a standard rate of VAT, which shall be fixed by each Member State as a percentage of the taxable amount and which shall be the same for the supply of goods and for the supply of services.
Consolidated version on EUR-Lex (CELEX 02006L0112-20250414). © European Union. Only the Official Journal is authentic.
Case law on Article 96: 39 cases
Judgments, orders and Advocate General opinions of the Court of Justice and the General Court that cite Article 96 of Directive 2006/112/EC, most recent first.
- C-515/24 Randstad España Judgment · 12 March 2026 · Spain
- C-409/24 J-GmbH (Selective application of the reduced rate of VAT) Judgment · 5 March 2026 · Germany
- C-576/23 Elite Games Order · 14 March 2024 · Romania
- C-733/22 Valentina Heights Judgment · 8 February 2024 · Bulgaria
- C-433/22 HPA - Construções Judgment · 11 January 2024 · Portugal
- C-146/22 Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (VAT on hot milk-based drinks) Judgment · 5 October 2023 · Poland
- C-330/21 The Escape Center Judgment · 22 September 2022 · Belgium
- C-218/21 Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira Judgment · 5 May 2022 · Portugal
- C-515/20 Finanzamt A Judgment · 3 February 2022 · Germany
- C-406/20 Phantasialand Judgment · 9 September 2021
- C-156/20 Zipvit Opinion · 8 July 2021 · United Kingdom
- C-703/19 Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach Judgment · 22 April 2021 · Poland
- C-331/19 Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Reduced rate of VAT for aphrodisiacs) Judgment · 1 October 2020 · Netherlands
- C-231/19 Blackrock Investment Management (UK) Opinion · 11 March 2020 · United Kingdom
- C-715/18 Segler-Vereinigung Cuxhaven Judgment · 19 December 2019 · Germany
- C-597/17 Belgisch Syndicaat van Chiropraxie and Others Judgment · 27 June 2019 · Belgium
- C-463/16 Stadion Amsterdam Judgment · 18 January 2018 · Netherlands
- C-499/16 AZ Judgment · 9 November 2017 · Poland
- C-573/15 Oxycure Belgium Judgment · 9 March 2017 · Belgium
- C-390/15 RPO Judgment · 7 March 2017 · Poland
- C-678/13 Commission v Poland Judgment · 4 June 2015 · Poland
- C-161/14 Commission v United Kingdom Judgment · 4 June 2015 · United Kingdom
- C-479/13 Commission v France Judgment · 5 March 2015
- C-502/13 Commission v Luxembourg Judgment · 5 March 2015
- C-639/13 Commission v Poland Judgment · 18 December 2014 · Poland
- C-219/13 K Judgment · 11 September 2014 · Finland
- C-144/13 VDP Dental Laboratory and Others Opinion · 4 September 2014 · Netherlands
- C-454/12 Pro Med Logistik and Pongratz Judgment · 27 February 2014 · Germany
- C-366/12 Klinikum Dortmund Opinion · 26 September 2013 · Germany
- C-108/11 Commission v Ireland Judgment · 14 March 2013 · Ireland
- C-360/11 Commission v Spain Judgment · 17 January 2013 · Spain
- C-596/10 Commission v France Judgment · 8 March 2012 · France
- C-441/09 Commission v Austria Judgment · 12 May 2011 · Austria
- C-453/09 Commission v Germany Judgment · 12 May 2011 · Germany
- C-41/09 Commission v Netherlands Judgment · 3 March 2011 · Netherlands
- C-49/09 Commission v Poland Judgment · 28 October 2010 · Poland
- C-492/08 Commission v France Judgment · 17 June 2010 · France
- C-94/09 Commission v France Judgment · 6 May 2010 · France
- C-484/06 Koninklijke Ahold Opinion · 24 January 2008 · Netherlands