Article 19 Directive 2006/112/EC
Supply of goods
Title IV · Taxable transactions › Chapter 1 · Supply of goods
Open in the compendium29 cases ↓
Before 1 January 2007: Article 5 of Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC, according to the correlation table in Annex XII. The wording is not identical.
Text of Article 19
In the event of a transfer, whether for consideration or not or as a contribution to a company, of a totality of assets or part thereof, Member States may consider that no supply of goods has taken place and that the person to whom the goods are transferred is to be treated as the successor to the transferor.
Member States may, in cases where the recipient is not wholly liable to tax, take the measures necessary to prevent distortion of competition. They may also adopt any measures needed to prevent tax evasion or avoidance through the use of this Article.
Consolidated version on EUR-Lex (CELEX 02006L0112-20250414). © European Union. Only the Official Journal is authentic.
Case law on Article 19: 29 cases
Judgments, orders and Advocate General opinions of the Court of Justice and the General Court that cite Article 19 of Directive 2006/112/EC, most recent first.
- T-366/25 Szytelbiecka Judgment · 9 September 2026 · Poland · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- T-413/25 Peckeger Judgment · 2 September 2026 · Austria
- T-397/25 A&P Deco Judgment · 2 September 2026 · Netherlands · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- T-268/25 Sampension Livsforsikring Opinion · 22 April 2026 · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- C-640/23 Greentech Judgment · 13 March 2025 · Romania
- C-171/23 UPCAFFE Opinion · 16 May 2024 · Croatia
- C-341/22 Feudi di San Gregorio Aziende Agricole Opinion · 28 September 2023 · Italy
- C-729/21 Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Łodzi Order · 16 January 2023 · Poland
- C-250/22 Fallimento Villa di Campo Order · 21 December 2022 · Italy
- C-1/21 Direktor na Direktsia Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika Judgment · 13 October 2022 · Bulgaria
- C-787/18 Sögård Fastigheter Judgment · 26 November 2020 · Sweden
- C-278/18 Sequeira Mesquita Judgment · 28 February 2019 · Portugal · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- C-17/18 Mailat Judgment · 19 December 2018 · Romania · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- C-249/17 Ryanair Opinion · 3 May 2018 · Ireland
- C-552/16 Wind Inovation 1 Judgment · 9 November 2017 · Bulgaria
- C-378/15 Mercedes Benz Italia Judgment · 14 December 2016 · Italy
- C-229/15 Mateusiak Opinion · 3 March 2016 · Poland
- C-651/11 X Judgment · 30 May 2013 · Netherlands · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- C-622/11 Pactor Vastgoed Opinion · 30 May 2013 · Netherlands · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- C-142/12 Marinov Judgment · 8 May 2013 · Bulgaria
- C-234/11 TETS Haskovo Opinion · 14 June 2012 · Bulgaria · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- C-444/10 Schriever Judgment · 10 November 2011 · Germany · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- C-280/10 Polski Trawertyn Opinion · 15 September 2011 · Poland
- C-29/08 SKF Judgment · 29 October 2009 · Sweden · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- C-284/04 T-Mobile Austria and Others Opinion · 7 September 2006 · Austria · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- C-32/03 Fini H Opinion · 28 October 2004 · Denmark · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- C-137/02 Faxworld Judgment · 29 April 2004 · Germany · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- C-497/01 Zita Modes Judgment · 27 November 2003 · Luxembourg · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive
- C-408/98 Abbey National Judgment · 22 February 2001 · United Kingdom · cites Article 5(8) of the Sixth Directive