Article 16 Directive 2006/112/EC
Supply of goods
Title IV · Taxable transactions › Chapter 1 · Supply of goods
Open in the compendium53 cases ↓
Before 1 January 2007: Article 5 of Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC, according to the correlation table in Annex XII. The wording is not identical.
Text of Article 16
The application by a taxable person of goods forming part of his business assets for his private use or for that of his staff, or their disposal free of charge or, more generally, their application for purposes other than those of his business, shall be treated as a supply of goods for consideration, where the VAT on those goods or the component parts thereof was wholly or partly deductible.
However, the application of goods for business use as samples or as gifts of small value shall not be treated as a supply of goods for consideration.
Consolidated version on EUR-Lex (CELEX 02006L0112-20250414). © European Union. Only the Official Journal is authentic.
Case law on Article 16: 53 cases
Judgments, orders and Advocate General opinions of the Court of Justice and the General Court that cite Article 16 of Directive 2006/112/EC, most recent first.
- T-413/25 Peckeger Judgment · 2 September 2026 · Austria
- T-366/25 Szytelbiecka Opinion · 13 May 2026
- T-268/25 Sampension Livsforsikring Opinion · 22 April 2026
- C-515/24 Randstad España Opinion · 23 October 2025
- T-575/24 Digipolis Opinion · 22 October 2025
- C-808/23 Högkullen Opinion · 6 March 2025 · Sweden
- C-207/23 Finanzamt X (Application and disposal of goods free of charge) Judgment · 25 April 2024 · Germany · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-533/22 Adient Opinion · 1 February 2024
- C-505/22 Deco Proteste - Editores Judgment · 5 October 2023 · Portugal
- C-627/21 Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov Order · 2 May 2022 · Romania
- C-4/20 ALTI Judgment · 20 May 2021 · Bulgaria
- C-528/19 Mitteldeutsche Hartstein-Industrie Judgment · 16 September 2020 · Germany · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-335/19 E. (VAT – Reduction of the taxable amount) Opinion · 4 June 2020 · Poland
- C-276/18 KrakVet Marek Batko Opinion · 6 February 2020 · Hungary
- C-140/17 Gmina Ryjewo Opinion · 19 April 2018 · Poland
- C-544/16 Marcandi Opinion · 7 March 2018 · United Kingdom · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-665/16 Gmina Wrocław Opinion · 22 February 2018 · Poland
- C-246/16 Di Maura Opinion · 8 June 2017 · Italy
- C-36/16 Posnania Investment Judgment · 11 May 2017 · Poland
- C-229/15 Mateusiak Opinion · 3 March 2016 · Poland
- C-256/14 Lisboagás GDL Judgment · 11 June 2015 · Portugal
- C-16/14 Property Development Company Judgment · 23 April 2015 · Belgium · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-438/13 BCR Leasing IFN Judgment · 17 July 2014 · Romania
- C-92/13 Gemeente ‘s-Hertogenbosch Opinion · 10 April 2014 · Netherlands · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-219/12 Finanzamt Freistadt Rohrbach Urfahr Opinion · 7 March 2013 · Austria · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-299/11 Gemeente Vlaardingen Opinion · 11 September 2012 · Netherlands · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-180/10 Słaby and Others Judgment · 15 September 2011 · Poland · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-106/10 Lidl & Companhia Judgment · 28 July 2011 · Portugal
- C-218/10 ADV Allround Opinion · 28 June 2011 · Germany · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-285/10 Campsa Estaciones de Servicio Judgment · 9 June 2011 · Spain · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-53/09 Loyalty Management UKand Baxi Group Judgment · 7 October 2010 · United Kingdom · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-581/08 EMI Group Judgment · 30 September 2010 · United Kingdom · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-515/07 Vereniging Noordelijke Land- en Tuinbouw Organisatie Opinion · 22 December 2008 · Netherlands · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-460/07 Puffer Opinion · 11 December 2008 · Austria · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-371/07 Danfoss and AstraZeneca Opinion · 23 October 2008 · Denmark · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-228/05 Stradasfalti Opinion · 22 June 2006 · Italy · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-184/04 Uudenkaupungin kaupunki Judgment · 30 March 2006 · Finland · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-435/03 British American Tobacco and Newman Shipping Opinion · 25 May 2005 · Belgium · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-412/03 Hotel Scandic Gåsabäck Judgment · 20 January 2005 · Sweden · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-434/03 Charles and Charles-Tijmens Opinion · 20 January 2005 · Netherlands · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-487/01 Gemeente Leusden and Holin Groep Judgment · 29 April 2004 · Netherlands · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-155/01 Cookies World Judgment · 11 September 2003 · Austria · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-427/98 Commission v Germany Judgment · 15 October 2002 · Germany · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-322/99 Fischer and Brandenstein Judgment · 17 May 2001 · Germany · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-415/98 Bakcsi Judgment · 8 March 2001 · Germany · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-142/99 Floridienne and Berginvest Opinion · 4 April 2000 · Belgium · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-400/98 Breitsohl Opinion · 16 December 1999 · Germany · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-48/97 Kuwait Petroleum Judgment · 27 April 1999 · United Kingdom · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-230/94 Enkler Opinion · 28 March 1996 · Germany · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-33/93 Empire Stores Opinion · 16 March 1994 · United Kingdom · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-291/92 Armbrecht Opinion · 15 September 1993 · Germany · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-20/91 De Jong Judgment · 6 May 1992 · Netherlands · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
- C-97/90 Lennartz Opinion · 30 April 1991 · Germany · cites Article 5(6) of the Sixth Directive
VAT Committee guidelines on Article 16: 3
Not binding. Positions agreed in the VAT Committee set up under Article 398 of Directive 2006/112/EC and published by the Commission.
- Meeting 102 · 30 March 2015 · document 4.3. Article 16 – tax treatment of reward-based crowdfunding, crowd-investing and crowd-lending
- Meeting 097 · 26 March 2012 · document 5.6 Article 16 – foodstuff donated to the poor – self-supply if not gift of small value – taxable amount made up by purchase price adjusted to state at time of donation
- Meeting 039 · 1993-07-05-06 · document II. Article 5(6)* – taxable person – private television companies – tangible movable property presented to game-show winners – supply of advertising service – self-supply of goods